By Benjamin H. Freedman
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Introduction
Benjamin Freedman and the ’’dynamic silence”
Traces of Freedman: New York Times articles 1946-1965
1. Seven Masters of Deception
2. Controlling Policies of Mass Media
3. President Wilson Blackmailed
4. Justice Brandeis - The Pay Off
5. Lloyd George - A Zionist Tool
6. Edward M. House - Conspirator
7. Selecting America’s Ally in WWI
8. Promoting Germans Victory and Stabbing Them in the Back
9. Worldwide Zionist Boycott against Nazi Germany
10. Franklin D. Roosevelt Manipulated
11. US Secretary of Defense Makes Startling Revelation
12. Conspirators Provoke Pearl Harbor Incident
13. A Pressured Eisenhower and Resolution 117
14. Eisenhower Fulfills the Zionist Demands in Middle East
15. John F. Kennedy Pledges Zionists
16. John F. Kennedy Enlightened on the Palestine Question
17. Neville Chamberlain and Ambassador Kennedy Sr.
18. Lyndon B. Johnson and the so-called Six Day War
19. Controlling the US Vote in the United Nations
20. Rothschilds and the Suez Canal
21. Zionist Supervision Necessary to Control Middle East Situation
22. Rothschild Interests and ’’Chosen” Asiatic Jews
Additional:
Other material by Freedman
Related books
Timetable
Quotes
This pamphlet: 40 pages
Co-authors: Max Epstein och James Leon Kelso (?)
Text edited by: RCF
Introduction
Benjamin Harrison Freedman was bom in 1890, and became a successful Jewish
businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the
Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized Jewry at the end of World
War II, 1945. At least 2.5 million dollars was spent by Mr. Freedman to educate
people about what he himself called ’’the Talmudic tyranny.” Its stronghold was -
and is - the United States of America. Mr. Freedman was ”an insider” at the high¬
est levels of Jewish machinations. Freedman became active in politics at an early
age and became acquainted with many important people, as Bernard Bamch,
Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph and his son
John F. Kennedy. He personally interviewed at length seven presidents of the
United States.
Although raised as a Jew, the author became disgusted with the chicanery of the
Jews, and Judaism, and became an ardent Christian.
Arnold Forster, a high official of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith or
ADL, in his 1988 autobiography Square One, called Benjamin Freedman an afflu¬
ent, apostate, self-hating Jew.
The magazine Commentary (published by the American Jewish Committee) for
February, 1955, referred to him as Jewish anti-Semite Benjamin Freedman. This
of course was only a way to ’’neutralize” him in the eyes of other Jews who were
blindly following their leaders.
’’This author has been in a position since 1912 to witness what was going on
behind the scenes. This author served on the National Democratic Committee in
the 1912 campaign that elected President Wilson to his first term. No doors have
been closed to this author since then. This author was ushered into this world in
1890 by Dr. Simon Baruch, the father of Mr. Bernard M. Baruch. Mr. Bernard
Baruch was a good friend of this author's family and would very often consult this
author on this situation.”
(Benjamin Freedman, from an extracted paragraph of this pamphlet)
’’Benjamin H. Freedman... committed himself to finding and telling the facts
about Zionism and Communism, and encouraged others to do the same. The son
of one of the founders of the American Jewish Committee, which for many years
was anti-Zionist, Ben Freedman founded the League for Peace with Justice in
Palestine in 1946. He gave me copies of materials on the Balfour Declaration
which I might never have found on my own and encouraged my own research.
(He died in April 1984.)”
(Robert John)
Benjamin Freedman and the ’’dynamic silence”
”I’ve read some of the interesting material published by anti-Zionist jew,
Benjamin Freedman. I only see it online, here. Checked several university
libraries, Lexus, Nexus, and Dialog, and still find nothing else on Freedman. Even
checked 50-75 y/o WHO'S WHO [in business, etc]. It’s like the man never
lived. His anti-Zionist, yet jewish manuscripts remind me very much of present-
day Israel Shahak. Both, understand that the most repressive force to ever bear
down on jews has always been rabbinical totalitarianism. The [now heavily cen¬
sored and difficult to find] writings of Hannah Arendt demonstrate that the
Zionists were more than willing to collaborate with the Nazi’s - in essence
because they both are kindred spirits which is totalitarian.”
Female writer on alt.revisionism (1997/06/20)
»Most persons reading this Internet posting should be familiar with who
Benjamin Harrison Freedman (23 Aug 1890 - Feb 1973) [1984 according to
Robert John or IHR editor] was. He was a very prominent Boston and New York
businessman. Born an Eastern European ”jew” and very much involved in view¬
ing and participating in the jewish machinations against freedom and traditional
American values, Freedman was appalled to see all that his fellow ’’jews” perpe¬
trated against this country. As a consequence, Benjamin Freedman, utterly sepa¬
rated himself from his fomrer jewish associates.
When world jewry agitated to seize Palestine and to form a ’’Jewish State” in
the Middle East, there was NO ONE more opposed to this than Freedman. He
was, then, one of the most prominent Anti-Zionists which is all the more astound¬
ing because Ben had emerged from that identical murky Talmudic network.
It is clear to this observer that the Ashkenazi Eastern Europeans who call them¬
selves ’’jews” very much regarded Freedman as a traitor and a great danger to their
cabal. The very familiar marxist tool of ’’dynamic silence” was effectively put to
use on Benjamin Freedman. Try as hard as you might, you will find virtually
NOTHING on the man in printed volumes. He SHOULD be found in WHO'S
WHO IN BUSINESS, in various biographies, in numerous printed references.
But, NO. It’s as if Benjamin Freedman never even existed.
As an antidote to this post-mortem attempt by the same khazaric ’’jews” to
destroy the memory of this great Anti-Zionist leader, I post this listing of several
newspaper items regarding Benjamin Freedman. The articles show that Ben did
everything humanly possible to derail the Un-American and anti-white but essen¬
tially Talmudic forces which have shaped the America we now live in. Here then
are a few listings which show that Freedman was VERY influential, extremely
well versed in the schemes and machinations of Un-American jewry, and that he
’’took no crap off anybody” who might impugn his good name and best intentions
for the Free Society we all should cherish.«
Male writer on alt.revisionism (1997/10/04)
Traces of Freedman: New York Times articles 1946-1965
New York Times July 8, 1946 p 3 column 1
Officers and members of the executive committee of the AMERICAN JEWISH COM¬
MITTEE said that they are ready to answer a $5M suit filed against them by Benjamin
H. Freedman of the LEAGUE FOR PEACE WITH JUSTICE IN PALESTINE.
The suit stemming from a circular memo by the AJC which said that newspapers ads
in behalf of the JUSTICE LEAGUE were really representative of Freedman, only.
New York Times May 3,1948 p 20 column 2
Evidence introduced Mid-Manhattan Magistrates Court sought to link Benjamin H.
Freedman with ’’the Grand Mufti” of Jerusalem and with the establishment of a sub¬
machine gun factory in Pakistan.
New York Times May 5,1948 p 35 column 7
Benjamin H. Freedman who says he has spent more than $100,000 of his own money
fighting Zionism charged that leading US Jews were the dictators of policy on Palestine.
Naming among others: Gov. Herbert H. Lehman. Bernard M. Baruch, Samuel I.
Rosenman, David K. Niles, Thomas J. Watson of IBM, and Edward M.M. Warburg.
Magistrate, Hyman Bushel, adjourned till tomorrow.
New York Times May 7, 1948 p 7 column 1
Under cross-examination from the Magistrate, Freedman stated that he was born in the
jewish faith but studied to be a Catholic. Magistrate Bushel countered, ’’The jews put you
out and the Catholics won’t have you.”
New York Times May 8, 1948 p 4 column 8
Benjamin H. Freedman testified that last winter he discussed partition [of
Palestine] at a dinner of 52 members of Congress and for which he paid the bill.
New York Times Dec 9,1950 p 18 column 6
Anna M. Rosenberg confronted the man who accused her of Communist-front affilia¬
tions, Robert de Sola, himself an admitted former Communist. She has said the case was
one ”of mistaken identity”. She had been nominated as Asst Secretary of Defense, by
Pres. Truman at the suggestion of Defense Seer., George C. Marshall.
New York Times Dec 12, 1950 p 41 column 2
Benjamin Freedman, NY businessman, testified in hearings against Anna M. Rosenberg
before the Senate Armed Services Committee. The session was highlighted by the
appearance of Sen. Richard Nixon, former member of the House Un-American
Activities Committee.
New York Times Dec 15, 1950 p 41 column 1
Benjamin Freedman first brought the Red charges against Anna M. Rosenberg to the
attention of the committee. Senators heard testimony today that Gerald L.K. Smith was
also consulted [by Freedman] that Rosenberg was once affiliated with Communists. She
has vigorously denied the charge.
New York Times Dec 17, 1950 p 24 column 3
Senate Armed Services Committee clears Rosenberg for Asst. Seer, of Defense position.
New York Times Mar 22. 1952 p 30 column 1
Benjamin H. Freedman of 300 Central Park, NY, described by counsel as the former
owner of a cosmetic company [Woodbury’s] filed suit seeking $12M in seven suits
against 15 broadcasting companies and news commentators with the NY State Supreme
Court. William S. Paley and Charles Collingwood had agreed to a settlement and
opposed a merger of the suits. The suits were based on news reports of Freedman's tes¬
timony in Dec 1950 of his testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee.
New York Times Aug 20, 1965 p 8 column 3
Benjamin Flarrison Freedman, retired businessman, urged Arthur J. Goldberg, US
Ambassador to UN, to prove his devotion to the rule of law by seeking a reversal of
American policies on Israel. Freedman declared that the presence of Israel was due
to a world Zionist plot involving the British. He went on to say that the existence of
a Jewish State in the Middle East could provoke a world nuclear war.
Male writer on alt.revisionism (1997/10/04)
Seven Masters of Deception
The names of Presidents Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S.
Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson and
Richard M. Nixon will certainly be found one day inscribed in big red letters in
the official annals of the rise and fall of the United states. These seven masters of
deception incurred their guilt by debasing their solemn oaths of office on behalf
of undisclosed domestic and foreign principals without any apparent qualms or
misgivings, to enhance their political fortunes totally oblivious of the threat to
United States security and survival. These seven masters of deception knowingly
and willingly in effect and in fact ’’poisoned the wells” of security and survival for
the United States. Without any evident scruples, they individually betrayed the
sacred traditions enshrined in the letter and spirit of their oaths of office, that pre¬
cious heritage bequeathed to each of these seven masters of deception as succes¬
sors to that high office exalted by the immortalized first president of the United
States, the venerated George Washington. The disclosures which follow here are
now revealed for the first time anywhere. They now expose for the first time to
the grass roots population of the United States the secret un-American, non-
American and anti-American strategy to which these seven masters of deception
knowingly subscribed. The uninhibited practice of that strategy by these seven
masters of deception is primarily responsible for desperate predicament in which
the United States today finds itself in the Middle East. Very early in their politi¬
cal careers, these seven masters of deception by their determination acquired their
proficient skill in detecting on which side their political bread was buttered. Their
remarkable perfection in that skill provides the answer to why these seven mas¬
ters of deception went so far and so fast in so few years in the political world in
which they moved. Throughout their political careers these seven masters of
deception demonstrated that political shrewdness invariably identified with the
immoral dogma of 20th century politicians who preach and practice ’’any means
justifies all ends.” Accordingly, future grass roots populations of the United States
will one day find inscribed in the history of the rise and fall of the United States
the verdict that the ’’means” today advocated by these seven masters of deception
were primarily responsible for the ’’end” of the United States. It is today a well
recognized fact of life in political circles in the United States that the censorship
exercised today by Zionists over the media for mass information constitutes a vir¬
tual monopoly. It is likewise today a well recognized fact of life in political cir¬
cles in the United States since President Wilson won his first election in 1912 as
president of the United States, that elections in the United States are seldom won
or lost today based upon the candidates’ qualification for office. Elections in the
United States since 1912 are won or lost on the battlefields of the media for mass
information by character assassination. Zionist ownership of media for mass
information, or by Zionist control exercised by some devious corporate device in
effect and in fact censors the news and editorial policies of as the leading daily
and Sunday newspapers, all the weekly and monthly news magazines, all leading
radio and television stations and networks, the entire motion picture industry, the
entire entertainment world and the entire book publishing industry, in effect and
in fact the entire complex of media for mass information in the United States,
truly a brainwashing monopoly.
Controlling Policies of Mass Media
As a result of that condition in the United States, for approximately the past fifty
years the grass root population of the United States has only read, heard and seen
what passed Zionist censorship and best served Zionist objectives, instead of read¬
ing, hearing and seeing what best served the interests of the grass roots population
of the United States. The Zionist-ruled media for mass information in the United
States never informed the grass roots population of the United States how and
why President Woodrow Wilson lied the United States into the desperate predica¬
ment in which the United States today finds itself in the Middle East. In their con¬
sideration recently of the alleged theft of the so-called Pentagon Papers, the
United States Supreme Court declared ’’the public has a right to know the truth.”
The Supreme Court should have said ’’the public has a right to know the WHOLE
truth.” The reason half-truths often are more harmful than lies. The United States
declared war against Germany on April 6, 1917. On April 2,1917 President
Wilson addressed both houses of Congress and pleaded with them to declare war
against Germany. President Wilson's appeal to Congress to declare war against
Germany in effect and in fact was primarily President Wilson’s liquidation of his
obligation to his blackmailers. The following incontestable facts confirm that con¬
clusion beyond all question of any doubt. President Wilson’s hand trembled as he
read his address. The members of Congress present had no reason to suspect why
President Wilson’s hand trembled. By the time the grass roots population finish
reading this, they will know the reason President Wilson’s hand trembled as he
read his message to Congress. By the time President Wilson finished reading his
appeal to Congress, many of his listeners were in tears but not for the reason the
grass roots population of the United States today will be in tears when they finish
reading this manuscript. When President Wilson asked Congress to declare war
against Germany, President Wilson was in effect and in fact conspiring to pay the
debt he obligated himself to pay to the Zionists. Congress only declared war
against Germany because President Wilson informed Congress that a German
submarine had sunk the S.S. Sussex in the English Channel in violation of inter¬
national law and that United States citizens aboard the S.S. Sussex had perished
with the ship. After General Pershing’s troops were fighting in Europe, the hoax
was exposed. The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was used as the ’’pretext” to
justify a declaration of war against Gemiany by the United States. The S.S.
Sussex had not been sunk and no United States citizens had lost their lives. The
United States was now at war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. That is what Great
Britain and the Talmudists of the world conspired to achieve in their crooked
diplomatic underworld. The discovery of the hoax by the British Navy shocked
many honorable Englishmen. A large segment of the British public were shocked
to learn the S.S. Sussex had not been sunk. The S.S. Sussex was available for any¬
one to visit who might care to do so to see the S.S. Sussex for themselves with
their own eyes. In that war the United States mobilized 4,734,991 men to serve in
the armed forces, of whom 115,516 were killed and 202,002 were either injured
or maimed for life. The Right Honorable Francis Neilson, a member of
Parliament, wrote a book in England called Makers of War (pp. 149-150). Mr.
Neilson’s book created such a sensation that Mr. Neilson was compelled to resign
his seat in Parliament. Things became so intolerable for Mr. Neilson in Great
Britain as a result of the exposures in his book that he was compelled for his per¬
sonal safety to flee from his home in Great Britain and to make his home in the
United States. In Mr. Neilson's book Makers of War (pp. 149-150), he discloses
many unsuspected and undisclosed reasons for the outbreak of World War I in
Europe in August 1914. With reference to the alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex
in the English Channel, Mr. Neilson emphasizes: "In America, Woodrow Wilson,
desperate to find a pretext to enter the war, found it at last in the ‘sinking" of the
Sussex in mid-channel. Someone invented a yam that American lives had been
lost. With thus excuse he went to Congress for a declaration of war. Afterwards,
the Navy found that the Sussex had not been sunk, and that no lives had been
lost.” This author crossed the English Channel many times on the S.S. Sussex.
The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was the figment of an over-worked Zionist
imagination. The alleged sinking of the S.S. Sussex was conceived in the imagi¬
nation of a Zionist to facilitate the purpose planned and successfully executed.
Wilson & Untermyer
President Wilson Blackmailed
Shortly after President Wilson's first inauguration, he received a visitor in the
White House by the name of Mr. Samuel Untermyer. Mr. Untermyer was a promi¬
nent New York City attorney who contributed generously to the National
Democratic Committee that installed President Wilson in the White House in
Washington in the 1912 election. Mr. Untermyer was a very welcome guest and
President Wilson was very glad to welcome him to the White House. They had
met before during the campaign. Mr. Untermyer surprised President Wilson when
he finally stated what brought hum to the White House. Mr. Untermyer informed
President Wilson that he had been retained to bring a breach of promise action
against President Wilson. Mr. Untermyer informed President Wilson that his
client was willing to accept $40,000 in lieu of commencing the breach of promise
action. Mr. Untermyer's client was the former wife of a Professor at Princeton
University at the same time President Wilson was a professor at Princeton
University. Mr. Untermyer produced a packet of letters from his pocket, written
by President Wilson to his colleague’s wife when they were neighbors at
Princeton University. These letters established the illicit relationship which had
existed between President Wilson and the wife of his colleague neighbor. He had
written many endearing letters to her, many of which she never destroyed.
President Wilson acknowledged his authorship of the letters after examining a few
of them. President Wilson left Princeton University to become the Governor of
New Jersey, In 1912 he was elected to his first term as president of the United
States. In the interim. President Wilson's former sweetheart had divorced her hus¬
band and married again. Her second husband resident in Washington with a grown
son who was in the employ of one of the leading banks in Washington. Mr.
Untermyer explained to President Wilson that his former sweetheart was very
fond of her husband's son. He explained that this son was in financial trouble and
suddenly needed $40,000, as he told the story, to liquidate a pressing liability to
the bank for which he worked. The details are not relevant here except that the son
needed the $40,000 badly and quickly. President Wilson's former sweetheart
thought that Wilson was the logical prospect for that $40,000,00 to help her hus¬
band's son. Mr. Untermyer visited President Wilson at the White House to break
the news to him about the breach of promise action being considered. Wilson
expressed himself as very fortunate that his former sweetheart went to Mr.
Untermyer to seek his assistance. The publicity could have proven very embar¬
rassing to President Wilson if his former sweetheart had instead consulted a
Republican attorney. President Wilson quickly set Mr. Untermyer's mind at rest
by informing him that he did not have $40,000 available for any purpose. Mr.
Untemiyer suggested that President Wilson should think the matter over and said
he would return in a few days to discuss the matter further. Mr. Untemiyer used
the next few days in Washington looking into the credibility of the son’s story
about his pressing need for $40,000 to liquidate a pressing liability. He learned
that the son’s story was not misrepresented in any way to his mother by her son.
Mr. Untermyer returned to President Wilson a few days later as they had agreed.
President Wilson did not hesitate to inform Mr. Untermyer that he did not have
the $40,000 to pay his blackmailer. President Wilson appeared irritated. Mr.
Untermyer considered the matter a few Moments and then volunteered a solution
to President Wilson for his problem. Mr. Untermyer volunteered to give President
Wilson’s former sweetheart the $40,000 out of his own pocket on one condition:
that Wilson promise Untermyer to appoint to the first vacancy on the United
States Supreme Court a nominee to be recommended to Wilson by Untermyer.
Without further talk. President Wilson accepted Mr. Untermyer’s generous offer
and Mr. Untermyer promptly paid the $40,000 in currency to President Wilson’s
former sweetheart. The contemplated breach of promise suit was never heard of
after that. Mr. Untermyer retained in his possession permanently the packet of let¬
ters to insure against any similar attempt at some future time. President Wilson
was most grateful to Mr. Untermyer for everything he was doing to solve prob¬
lem. Mr. Untermyer was a man of great wealth. The law firm in New York of
which he was the leading partner, Messrs. Guggenheim, Untermyer and Marshall,
is still today one of the nations most prominent and most prosperous law firms.
Mr. Untermyer organized the Bethlehem Steel Company for his friend, Mr.
Charles M. Schwab, who resigned from the United States Steel Company to form
his company in competition with it.
Brandeis
Justice Brandeis - The Pay Off
As anyone might reasonable suspect, Mr. Untermyer must have had something in
mind when he agreed to pay President Wilson's former sweetheart $40,000 out of
his own pocket. He paid the money out of his own pocket in the hope that it might
bring to pass a dream close to his heart - a Talmudist on the United States
Supreme Court on which none had ever served. The day soon arrived when
President Wilson was presented with the necessity of appointing a new member
of the United States Supreme Court. Mr. Untermyer recommended Louis Dembitz
Brandeis for the vacancy, who was immediately appointed by Wilson. President
Wilson and Justice Brandeis became unusually intimate friends. Justice Brandeis
knew the circumstances of his appointment to the Supreme Court by President
Wilson. In 1914 Justice Brandeis was the most prominent and most politically
influential of all Zionists in the United States. As a Justice of the United States
Supreme Court, Brandeis was in a better position than ever before to be of serv¬
ice to Talmudists both at home and abroad. The first opportunity to perform a
great service for his Zionist followers soon became available to Brandeis. Justice
Brandeis volunteered his opinion to President Wilson that the sinking of the S.S.
Sussex by a German submarine in the English Channel with the loss of lives of
United States citizens justified the declaration of war against Germany by the
United States. Relying to a great extent upon the legal opinion of Justice Brandeis,
President Wilson addressed both houses of Congress on April 2, 1917. He
appealed to Congress to declare war against Germany and they did on April 7,
1917. After the October 1916 agreement was concluded between the British War
Cabinet and the World Zionist Organization, the Talmudists throughout the world
were hopeful that an international incident would soon occur to justify a declara¬
tion of war against Germany by the United States. The declaration of war against
Germany by the United States guaranteed the Talmudists throughout the world
that Palestine was to be turned over to them upon the defeat of Germany. The
defeat of Germany was certain if the United States could be railroaded into the
war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. Prior to the October 1916 London
Agreement, Talmudists throughout the world were pro-German. The German
Emancipation Edict of 1822 guaranteed Talmudists in Germany all civil rights
enjoyed by Germans. Every country in Europe had quotas for Talmudists. The
quota systems had existed for centuries in all European countries. Under the quota
system in European countries, Talmudists were Limited in all activities to a small
percentage of the Christian population of the country. The quota systems applied
to all occupations. After the Emancipation Edict. In 1822, Germany was the only
country in Europe which did not place restrictions on Talmudists under a quota
system limiting their civil rights. Talmudists throughout the world were informed
by cable from London about the October 1916 London Agreement. That infor¬
mation transformed them from pro-German to pro-British. Great Britain placed at
the disposal of Talmudists in London their secret codes and worldwide cable facil-
ities to inform Talmudists throughout the world about Great Britain's pledge to
turn over Palestine to them as compensation for railroading the United States into
the war in Europe as Great Britain s ally in their war against Germany. Talmudists
enlisted in great numbers in October 1916 in Great Britain's Department of
Defense. Their purpose was to facilitate transforming Talmudists throughout the
world from pro-German to pro-British. After the London Agreement was con¬
cluded, Great Britain left no stone unturned to impress Talmudists in London with
the necessity of immediately notifying Talmudists throughout the world about
Great Britain's pledge to turn over Palestine to them for their future sovereign
Zionist state. Guided by the recommendation of Justice Brandeis that the sinking
of the S.S. Sussex justified a declaration of war under international law against
Germany by the United States, President Wilson addressed a joint session of both
houses of Congress on April 2, 1917. In that address President Wilson pleaded
with Congress to declare war against Germany. Congress met on April 6. 1917
and declared war against Germany without justification. On April 6, 1917,
President Wilson and Justice Brandeis knew something the grass roots population
of the United States did not know - they knew full particulars about the October
1916 London Agreement. They also knew the declaration of war against Germany
by the United States activated this agreement and that Talmudists of the world
would not have to wait long for Palestine, their sovereign Zionist state, if their
plan worked. On this same day, Wilson and Brandeis knew something else the
grass roots population of the United States did not know - they knew that the dec¬
laration of war by the United States against Germany discharged President Wilson
from his obligation to his blackmailers. Wilson’s declaration of war was to satis¬
fy his commitment to his blackmailers. There was seldom any address made to
Congress that stirred the people of the United States, and the world, as did
President Wilson's April 2, 1917, plea to Congress to declare war against
Germany. Wilson was aware when he addressed Congress that Germany had not
committed any act against the United States which justified a declaration of war
by the United States against Germany under international law. This author at that
time knew President Wilson was informed to that effect before he made his plea
to Congress.
George
Lloyd George - A Zionist Tool
There were great numbers of Talmudists in the United States who questioned the
reality of the October 1916 London Agreement. They found it extremely difficult
to believe that Great Britain would promise to turn over Palestine to them as com¬
pensation for railroading the United States into the war in Europe as Great
Britain's ally. These Talmudists could not believe that Great Britain would prom¬
ise anything to anyone that Great Britain did not own as compensation. That
appeared inconceivable to Talmudists familiar with Great Britain's reputation for
respect of property rights under their laws. To overcome doubts that existed in the
minds of Talmudists in the United States, Prime Minister Lloyd George immedi¬
ately sent Mr. Josiah Wedgewood to the United States. Mr. Wedgewood was one
of the most respected and dedicated members of Parliament. Prime Minister
Lloyd George, a rabid well-known Zionist, was unexpectedly appointed Prime
Minister on December 4, 1916. He rushed Mr. Wedgewood to the United States
on December 5, 1916, under pressure by Talmudists in London. The prime min¬
ister whom Lloyd George succeeded was unsympathetic Toward Zionist objec¬
tives. He was replaced at that time because Zionists could not rule him. Great
Britain was helpless in October 1916. It was seriously considering surrender to
Germany. Germany had made several peace offers to Great Britain earlier to dis¬
continue the war. Mr. Lloyd George considered Mr. Wedgewood" s hasty trip to the
United States vital to Great Britain's survival. Mr. Wedgewood went to the United
States with documented evidence proving the reality of the October 1916 London
Agreement with the Talmudists.
*• *
^ \
House
Edward M. House - Conspirator
Mr. Wedgewood arrived in the United States on December 23, 1916. Upon his
arrival he was met at the pier by Colonel Edward Mandel House, President
Wilson’s closest personal friend and most tmsted adviser. Col. House in early life
negotiated cotton purchases in the United States for Rothschild interests in Great
Britain. Col. House did not claim or disclaim his Talmudist ancestry to this author.
He had arranged with Mr. Wedgewood to live in his apartment on 54th Street dur¬
ing his stay in the United States. Col. House quickly made arrangements for the
meeting at which Mr. Wedgewood was to prove the reality of the October 1916
London Agreement. The meeting was to be held on Sunday afternoon, December
25,1916, at the old Hotel Savoy at 59th Street and Fifth Avenue in New Yolk City.
There were fifty-one invited Talmudists present there when Col. House intro¬
duced Mr. Wedgewood to the audience. Mr. Wedgewood then presided. Mr.
Wedgewood presented evidence there that left no doubt in the minds of the fifty-
one Talmudists present about the reality of the October 1916 London Agreement.
On behalf of Mr. Lloyd George, Mr. Wedgewood further vouched for the reality
of Great Britain pledge that Palestine would be turned over to Talmudists of the
world by Great Britain upon the defeat of Germany as compensation for railroad¬
ing the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. After con¬
cluding the October 1916 London Agreement, Talmudists in England were invit¬
ed by Great Britain to take an increasingly active participation in Great Britain's
Department of Defense for the duration of the war. The Talmudists who accepted
the invitation were trained as experts in the use of Great Britain's codes and Great
Britain's worldwide diplomatic cable facilities. The available data in Great
Britain's archives for World War I will dispel all existing doubt whether the infor¬
mation cabled to Washington from London alleging the sinking of the S.S. Sussex
and the loss of United States lives was the invention of Talmudists in London in
Great Britain's Department of Defense to facilitate and expedite railroading the
United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain's ally. The hoax was dis¬
covered by the British Navy. It was also confirmed by other equally reliable
sources for information on the subject by qualified united States experts. The real¬
ity of the October 1916 London Agreement was known to the Germans shortly
after it was concluded, in fact, on the same day. Germany thereafter exercised
great care both on land and on sea not to commit any act which, under interna¬
tional law, could provide the United States with justification to declare war
against Germany. German military and naval commanders leaned over backwards
in their effort not to provide the United States with that justification and they were
successful. In the crisis in October 1916, Germans had reason to feel if the war in
Europe continued a few more months without the entrance of the United States
into the war, that Great Britain would be compelled to surrender to Germany by
circumstances beyond Great Britain's power to control. Germany made another
peace offer to Great Britain in October 1916. Great Britain this time welcomed the
offer but it was also declined like several previous peace offers. In referring to the
declaration of war against Germany by the United States, Sir Winston Churchill
said in an interview with a prominent editor, published in Scribner’s Commentator
in 1936, that he ’’could never understand why he put us in in 1917,” referring to
President Wilson. In that interview Sir Winston Churchill stated further:
"America should have minded her own business and stayed out of the World War.
If you hadn't entered the war the Allies would have made peace with Germany in
the spring of 1917. Had we made peace there would have been no collapse of
Russia followed by Communism, no breakdown in Italy followed by Fascism, and
Germany would not have signed the Versailles Treaty, which has enthroned
Nazism in Germany. If America had stayed out of the war, all of these ‘isms’
wouldn't be sweeping the continent of Europe and breaking down parliamentary
government, and if England made peace early in 1917, it would have saved over
one million British, French, American and other lives. Gemiany’s peace offer to
Great Britain asked for neither indemnities nor reparations. Germany offered to
restore the territorial status and the political independence of every country with
whom Great Britain was at war, as they existed in August 1914 when the war in
Europe started. Germany demanded no benefits.”
Selecting America’s Ally in WWI
Germany’s October 1916 peace offer was on the table before the British War
Cabinet; it needed only one signature to end the war. Great Britain would have
quickly accepted Gemiany’s peace offer if the World Zionist Organization had not
Interfered. The British War Cabinet was then taking their instructions from
Talmudists in London. When the British War Cabinet decided to accept
Germany’s peace offer, the World Zionist Organization offered to railroad the
United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain’s ally if Great Britain prom¬
ised the Talmudists of the world Palestine as compensation after Germany’s defeat
with the United States as an ally. Talmudist pressure in London and New York
prevailed. President Wilson had little choice in the matter, it seemed. He was the
captive of circumstances in his early life that could not be altered. His April 2,
1917, address to Congress was about to decide the fate of the world. Congress,
without hesitation, declared war against Germany for him. The Germans attrib¬
uted their crushing defeat in World War I to the entry of the United States into the
war in Europe as Great Britain’s ally. Gemiany considered the October 1916
London Agreement a stab in the back by Talmudists of the world. In view of the
Emancipation Edict in Germany in 1822, Germans regarded the London
Agreement as a double-cross by Talmudists in Germany. Quota systems then
existed in all other countries in Europe. There was no quota system in Germany
after the Emancipation Edict of 1822 for Talmudists.
Promoting Germans Victory and Stabbing Them in the Back
The Kaiser provided the World Zionist Organization with the offices for their
world headquarters in Berlin. He, his family and government officials were con¬
stantly extending assistance to Theodor Herzl. Germany extended opportunities to
Talmudists not available in other European countries. The Kaiser himself
arranged the personal meeting between the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire and
Theodor Herzl. Bleichroeder & Company in Berlin were the private bankers of
the Kaiser’s family for generations. They were Talmudists. Warburg & Company
of Hamburg were the world's largest merchant bankers. They were Talmudists.
The head of the German General Electric Company, then the world’s largest
industrial enterprise, was a Talmudist. The head of the Hamburg-American and
North German Lloyd steamship companies, the two largest steamship companies
in the world, second only to the Cunard Line, was a Talmudist. Countless promi¬
nent German industrialists, bankers and merchants were Talmudists. The attitude
of Gemians towards Talmudists in Germany and throughout the world worsened
much after the October 1916 stab in the back by Talmudists. Mr. Samuel
Landman, the secretary of the World Zionist Organization in London from 1917
to 1922, wrote in his Great Britain, the Jews and Palestine, published in London
in 1936, on page six: ’’The fact that it was Jewish help that brought the U.S.A. into
the war on the side of the Allies has rankled ever since in German - especially
Nazi - minds and has contributed in no small measure to the prominence which
anti-Semitism occupied in the Nazi program.” The sentiments of prominent
German leaders were expressed in the Jewish Daily Bulletin of New York City on
October 30, 1934, in an article reprinted on page three from the Jewish
Telegraphic Agency dispatch from Berlin which stated: ’’The New Germany per¬
sists toward the complete extermination of the Jew because it was Jews who insti¬
gated the United States to enter the World War, accomplishing the defeat of
Germany, and who later caused the inflation in Germany, Herr Richard Kunze, a
leading Nazi Parliament figure, declared at a mass meeting in Magdeburg yester¬
day.” Talmudists throughout the world made bad matters worse on August 7,
1933, when they declared their ’’holy war” to destroy the Gemran nation ”by
destroying their export trade upon which their very existence depends.” Under the
leadership of Mr. Samuel Unternryer, Talmudists of the world declared a world
boycott on all Gemian goods and services. They asked their "Christian friends” to
join their worldwide boycott of Gemian goods and services. Mr. Samuel
Untermyer arranged for the ’’International Boycott Conference” in Amsterdam in
July 1933. There he was elected the president of the ’’World Jewish Economic
Lederation.” Talmudists throughout the world had tried in vain since 1919 to
silence German resentment against them for railroading the United States into the
war in Europe without justification or provocation by the United States as Great
Britain’s ally. Talmudists were held responsible for Gemiany’s defeat and for
every disadvantage that resulted from that defeat. The New York Times of August
7, 1933, published the Talmudists’ declaration of their ’’holy war” against
Gemrany in a three-column report of Mr. Untermyer’s address to the nation from
the Columbia Broadcasting Company’s studio on the night of his arrival home
from Europe. Mr. Untermyer, among other things, stated: ”... holy war... in which
we are embarked... it is a war which must be waged unremittingly... the Jews are
the aristocrats of the world... the economic boycott against all German goods,
shipping and services... boycott is our only really effective weapon... bring the
German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very
existence depends... we shall force them to learn... it is not sufficient that you buy
no goods in Germany... you must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper
who sells any German-made goods... we will drive the last nail in the coffin...”
That statement was made on August 7, 1933, when not a hair on the head of a
Talmudist in Germany had been touched. Germany was plunged into a depression
difficult to describe in a few words, Germany’s export business suddenly ending
as if by magic. Talmudists hoped that way to stop Gemians from continuing to
talk about why they lost the war. Talmudists in Germany were finding it difficult
to live that down. Germans then felt the way Sir Winston Churchill in 1936
expressed himself about the entry of the United States into World War I in 1917.
Worldwide Zionist Boycott against Nazi Germany
The eminent Rabbi Maurice L. Perlman, head of the British Section of the World
Jewish Congress, stated to a Canadian audience as reported by The Toronto
Evening Telegram of February 26, 1940, that: ’’The World Jewish Congress has
been at war with Gemrany for seven years. ” Senator Wayne Morse of Oregon
delivered an address on December 20, 1951, as reported in The National Jewish
Post of Indianapolis of December 28, 1951, in which he stated: ’’One of the major
causes for our going to war against Hitler was the persecution of the Jews in
Germany.” Dr. Donald C. Blaisdell. professor of government at the College of the
City of New York, published an important document entitled American Policy for
the near East in a publication called Issues published in New York, the official
organ of the American Council for Judaism, in the fall issue in 1959, in which Dr.
Blaisdell stated: ”No minority of Irish, of Gemian, of Polish, Italian, or Greek
extraction has been able to manipulate policy to its advantage as have the Zionist
leaders of American Jews. Nor does there appear to be any politically feasible
means by which the American government can place the claims of its important
clientele in proper perspective. Like American Jews who are presumed to be
members of Israel’s American clientele are never allowed to forget it, so the
American government. Congress and Executive branch alike, is never pemritted
to free itself from the pressure, propaganda and power emanating from the same
Zionist sources.”
Baruch & Roosevelt
Franklin D. Roosevelt Manipulated
President Franklin D. Roosevelt was a captive of the Talmudists from the time he
went to Albany as governor of the state of New York. President Roosevelt was
long beholden to the Talmudists. The story of how President Roosevelt lied the
United States into the desperate predicament in which the United States today
finds itself in the Middle East is not a long story. It is the story of how President
Roosevelt railroaded the United States into the Second World War: Germany and
Poland had agreed upon a formula giving Germany access across the Danzig
Corridor. President Wilson, in 1919, created the Danzig Corridor which separated
Germany into two halves. In order to keep Germany weak, at the instigation of
Talmudists at the Versailles Peace Conference, President Wilson cut Germany into
two halves, separated by a strip of German territory granted to Poland which
divided Germany into two halves. Crossing the Danzig Corridor from western
Germany to eastern Germany or vice versa was like traveling from one country to
another. The inconveniences, the delays and the annoyances to Germany and
Poland had finally worked out their acceptable arrangement that eliminated a
majority of German objections to the Danzig Corridor. Germany and Poland
reached a basis that would serve to prevent Germany’s resort to more aggressive
action. Adolf Hitler was the head of the German government at the time.
Talmudists throughout the world opposed the peaceful adjustment between
Germany and Poland of the Danzig Corridor situation. Unrestricted access of traf¬
fic between the western half and the eastern half of Germany would soon make
Germany again the most powerful country in the world. Talmudists throughout
the world dreaded the thought. In spite of the difficulties placed in the way of
reaching a solution for the Danzig Corridor problem, Germany and Poland final¬
ly agreed upon a formula. Preparations were being made to consummate their
understanding in a treaty. Both Gemiany and Poland were satisfied the formula
agreed upon served both governments. Shortly before the agreement with
Germany was to be signed, Poland secretly signed a treaty with Great Britain
dated August 25. 1939. Great Britain agreed in that treaty to hasten the military
assistance of Poland ’’with all the support and assistance in its power” if Poland
were attacked by Gemiany. With that assurance from Great Britain, Poland broke
off negotiations with Germany. Gemiany did not understand the reason for
Poland’s sudden change of mind and decided to proceed with the terms of the
arrangement agreed upon with Poland. That was the start of World War II. Great
Britain knowingly deceived Poland when Great Britain actually promised military
assistance to Poland if Poland were attacked by Germany. Great Britain could not
come to Poland’s assistance and Great Britain knew it when Great Britain’s offer
of military assistance to Poland was made. Poland fell into Great Britain's trap
and discontinued negotiations with the Germans. Poland's unexplained discontin¬
uance of negotiations with Germany to complete the Danzig Corridor agreement
resulted in Germany’s troops moving into the Danzig Corridor without an agree¬
ment with Poland. Great Britain knew exactly what would take place in that event,
that it would mean the beginning or World War II. The rest is history. Talmudists
of the world welcomed a war against Gemiany in 1939 to somehow crush the Nazi
government as the Talmudists of the world crushed Germany in World War I in
1917 by railroading the United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain’s
ally. President Roosevelt tried his hardest in 1939 to railroad the United States
into the war in Europe to accommodate Talmudists in the United States. Gemiany
learned by experience in World War I that the entry of the United States into the
war in Europe in 1939 could prove equally disastrous to Germany if the United
States were railroaded into war in Europe as Great Britain’s ally. Germany exer¬
cised extraordinary caution not to provide the United States with justification
under international law to declare war against Germany. That situation presented
President Roosevelt with a problem. President Roosevelt decided if it were impos¬
sible for him to get into the war in Europe through the front door that he would
railroad the United States into the war in Europe through the back door. Through
the back door meant through Japan. President Roosevelt finally did railroad the
United States into the war in Europe through the back door, through Japan.
Stimson
US Secretary of Defense Makes Startling Revelation
Germany and Japan had a treaty under which if either Gemiany or Japan were
attacked by a third power, the country which was not attacked by the third power
automatically is at war with that third power. President Roosevelt planned to pro¬
voke Japan so Japan would attack the United States. Japan in December 1941
attacked Pearl Harbor. The United States immediately declared war against Japan
and automatically was at war with Germany. The personal diary of the Hon. Mr.
Henry L. Stimson and all his papers are in Yale University Library. Mr. Stimson
each day entered in his personal diary in his own handwriting the important events
in his life that day. Mr. Stimson was President Roosevelt's secretary of defense.
Mr. Stimson's diary was introduced as evidence in the United States Senate inves¬
tigation of the Pearl Harbor attack by Japan over the strong objections of friends
of President Roosevelt. Mr. Stimson entered in his diary on November 25, 1941,
two weeks before Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor, that at a meeting with President
Roosevelt and his cabinet that morning at the White House, President Roosevelt
told those present that he wished to be at war against Japan but that he ’’did not
want it to appear that the United States fired the first shot.”
Conspirators Provoke Pearl Harbor Incident
President Roosevelt knowingly provoked Japan to attack the United States.
President Roosevelt advised Japan they could purchase no more steel scrap or oil
from the United States. Japan was in the midst of a war against China. Without
scrap steel and without oil Japan would be unable to continue that war. Japan was
totally dependent upon the United States for both steel scrap and oil. Professor
Charles Callan Tansill, professor of diplomatic history at Georgetown University
in Washington, wrote a classic work he called Back Door to War, published by
Henry Regnery of Chicago in 1952. Professor Tansill spent five years after the
war in the confidential files of the State Department doing research there on
World War H. Professor Tansill's book has 652 pages all filled with alarming
authenticated facts little known to the public during the war. In a scholarly
detailed manner easily understood. Professor Tansill supplies facts which are
incontrovertible proof showing how President Roosevelt railroaded the United
States into World War II in Europe. President Roosevelt’s desire to please
Talmudists among his friends, influenced his better judgment. He overlooked that
he was president of all the people of the United States. President Roosevelt real¬
ized if he expected political support by Talmudists in the United States to contin¬
ue he must find some way to railroad the United States into the war then in
progress in Europe against Germany. Surely nobody can any longer question that
railroading the United States into World War II was President Roosevelt’s contri¬
bution to the desperate predicament in which the United States today funds itself
in the Middle East. President Harry S. Truman made his great contribution to the
desperate predicament in which the United States today funds itself in the Middle
East when he recognized as a sovereign state an armed uprising in Palestine by
800,000 armed aliens transplanted into Palestine in a conspiracy organized by
Talmudists throughout the world. President Truman in 1946 suffered from a
pathological obsession that he must be elected president of the United States in
1948 on his own account. Mr. Clarke M. Clifford, Secretary of War under
President Lyndon B. Johnson, deserves a great deal of credit for the recognition
of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, by the United States. Mr. Eliahu Epstein,
the United States representative of the Jewish Agency in Washington in 1948, told
the story in his three-page article in the Jewish Chronicle of London in its 10th
anniversary issue of June 1958 celebrating the 10th anniversary of the founding
of the State of Israel. Mr. Clifford undoubtedly was anxious to help because
President Truman had confided in his close friends that he wished to recognize the
Zionist state in the ’’first hour of its birth” as he did. The State of Israel was offi¬
cially ’’proclaimed” in Tel Aviv at midnight on May 14, 1948. President Truman
recognized the birth of the State of Israel eleven minutes after midnight. President
Truman finally advised this author that he did not wish to carry on the discussion
of the Zionist question with him any further. He wrote to this author that he had
turned over the entire Palestine question to ’’the Hon. David Niles.” Talmudists
were willing to carry out their part of their bargain with President Truman after he
recognized the State of Israel. Although the odds in President Truman's election
in 1948 were 20 to 1 against his election. President Truman romped home the win¬
ner over Governor Dewey assisted by the invisible and invincible Zionist politi¬
cal steam-roller that always elects their candidates. President Truman not only
used the power and prestige of the United States to compel the United Nations to
admit the State of Israel as a peace-loving nation, the regime of an armed upris¬
ing in Palestine by transplanted aliens, but he made billions of United States tax¬
payers dollars available to Talmudists to make the State of Israel powerful. When
the day to vote for the admission of the State of Israel arrived they were short two
votes. The plan was about to collapse. In the emergency, Mr. Charles H. Silver
engaged Cardinal Spellman to make two trips to South America to change their
votes in the United Nations against the admission of the State of Israel into the
United Nation to vote in favor of the admission of the State of Israel into the
United Nations as a member. The newspapers around the world on June 11, 1964,
published Mr. Silver’s ’’confession” of a ’’secret I have kept for fifteen years.” The
’’secret” Cardinal Spellman kept with Mr. Silver was that Cardinal Spellman was
sent to South America by Mr. Silver on behalf of the Talmudists in New York to
’’persuade” the South American countries to change their votes against admitting
the State of Israel to the United Nations to vote in favor of admitting the State of
Israel to the United Nations as a member. This author was a close personal friend
of Cardinal Spellman for twenty-five years. Cardinal Spellman ’’confessed” to this
author several years ago that he felt he had committed an irreparable sin by con¬
spiring with the Talmudists in the United States to elect the State of Israel a mem¬
ber of the United Nations. In the midst of that bloody fighting in the Middle East
in June 1967, Cardinal Spellman told this author when alone with him in his study
that he felt personally responsible for all the lives lost in the 1967 invasion of the
United Arab Republic and Syria by the State of Israel.
A Pressured Eisenhower and Resolution 117
The story of how President Dwight D. Eisenhower lied the United States into the
desperate predicament in which the United States today finds itself in the Middle
East is not a complicated story. Talmudists in the United States pressured
President Eisenhower into sponsoring Joint Resolution by Congress of H J Res.
117, on January 5, 1950, which was then refined by Congress to the Committee
on Foreign Affairs. President Eisenhower knew less about what he was doing than
a new born babe. It was pitiful for this author to witness a great general being fig¬
uratively pushed around by Talmudists unfit to shine his shoes. President
Eisenhower was always friendly towards this author. This author met President
Eisenhower when he was being considered by Mr. Thomas M. Watson, Sr., as a
presidential candidate on the Democratic ticket. Mr. Watson was the founder of
the International Business Machines Company. He told this author at that time
that he believed General Eisenhower as a Civilian would make a great president.
As president of the United States, General Eisenhower was faithful to these
Talmudist supporters whose friendship he first cultivated in Europe during his
political activities in Germany after the end of World War II. Talmudists curried
his favor after World War II. They knew that as president of the United States,
General Eisenhower in their hands would be like clay in the hands of the potter.
In 1956 it appeared that Middle East countries were undergoing changes in their
governments. The Zionist illegal occupation of Palestine still existed. Populations
in Middle East countries were growing restless. Talmudists recognized something
must be done to silence the unrest. President Eisenhower then obliged the
Talmudists. Lebanon is the heart of Middle East political activity. To nip action in
the bud, by native populations aiming to assert their independence from domina¬
tion by Talmudists, Talmudists arranged with President Eisenhower to occupy
Lebanon with fourteen thousand (14.000) troops and to station the Sixth Fleet off
the coast. To make it legal, Talmudists had Congress pass a Joint resolution like
the Tonkin Bay Resolution passed by Congress to legalize the war in Vietnam.
Eisenhower Fulfills the Zionist Demands in Middle East
President Eisenhower occupied Lebanon with fourteen thousand (14,000) United
States troops and stationed the sixth Fleet off the Lebanon coast. President
Eisenhower was warning the Middle East nations not to attempt to regain
Palestine from the Zionists in illegal possession of Palestine. President
Eisenhower must have had a consortium of the smartest Talmudists the state
defense and justice departments prepare that joint resolution. The intent of that
unclear language is to conceal the purpose of the joint Resolution not to explain
its purpose. The purpose was to have a joint resolution in record that would per¬
mit President Eisenhower to use the United States armed forces and navy to aid
and abet the Zionist thieves to hold onto their stolen loot without any necessity to
ask Congress to declare war. Every word President Eisenhower uttered to defend
the crooks in occupation of Palestine was a lie which contributed to the desperate
predicament in which the United States today finds itself in the Middle East.
Talmudists in the United States were able to camouflage their illegal aggression
in the Middle East behind the glamour of President Eisenhower’s record as a great
soldier.
John F. Kennedy Pledges Zionists
The story of how President John F. Kennedy lied the United States into the des¬
perate predicament in which the United States today finds itself in the Middle East
is very distressing. President Kennedy’s future was uncertain after digressing on
August 25, 1960, from the straight and narrow path he had followed all his life.
President Kennedy could not escape the consequences of his betrayal of the high
principles to which he aimed to dedicate his life. President Kennedy surrendered
to the lure of Talmudists who pledged to put him in the White House as the pres¬
ident of the United States. On August 23 1960, in the United States Senate office
building in Washington President Kennedy, at that time a senator, gave this author
a copy of the address he was to deliver in New York City on August 25, 1960. In
the copy of that address he stated among other things: ’’Israel... three weeks ago I
said in a public statement ‘Israel is here to stay’... my flat prediction that Israel is
here to stay... will endure and flourish... a special obligation on the Democratic
Party... it was President Truman who first recognized the new State of Israel and
gave it status in world affairs... may I and... my hope and my pledge to continue
the democratic tradition... if the Democratic platform is to have any meaning... the
White House must take the lead... American intervention., will not now be easy...
I propose that we make it crystal clear... we will act promptly and decisively... I
propose that we make it clear... our guarantee that we will act with whatever force
and speed are necessary... the risk of war...” President (Senator) Kennedy was giv¬
ing Talmudists his pledge that as the president of the United States he would send
sons, husbands and brothers of the grass roots population of the United States to
fight in Palestine under the flag of the United States in a war in Palestine to help
crooks hold onto stolen loot, to aid and abet thieves retain possession of their
stolen plunder. This author met President Kennedy for the first time in his father’s
office at 230 Park Avenue, in New York City, on the day after he was elected for
the first time as a Congressman in November 1946. This author was in a confer¬
ence with Ambassador Joseph Kennedy and Judge Landis, an associate of
Ambassador Kennedy. In his private office they were consulting this author on the
Middle East situation which had recently taken an ugly turn in the United Nations.
John F. Kennedy Enlightened on the Palestine Question
Ambassador Kennedy discussed the subject matter for a short while with those
present. The Congressman then asked to leave as he was catching a train for
Washington. This author invited the Congressman to lunch and he accepted. After
lunch Congress Kennedy asked if this author had nothing else to do than ride to
Washington with him on the train. This author was willing and rode to
Washington with him. From that day in November 1946 to August 23, 1960, this
author saw the Congressman, and the Senator, countless times in his office in
Washington and New York City. This author was happy to enlighten Senator
Kennedy on the Palestine question. Without a doubt there were soon few people
in the world who were better informed on this subject than Senator Kennedy. In
the fourteen years this author had the honor of enjoying the confidence of
President Kennedy he never failed to express his appreciation for this author's
interest in his career. President Kennedy also appreciated the friendship this
author demonstrated for his father. Ambassador Kennedy. Ambassador Kennedy
was blackmailed by President Roosevelt. President Roosevelt told Ambassador
Kennedy not to write the book he planned to write. President Roosevelt removed
Ambassador Kennedy as Ambassador to the Court of St. James in London for cir¬
culating what Neville Chamberlain told Ambassador Kennedy in London in 1938.
Chamberlain and Hitler, 1938
Neville Chamberlain and Ambassador Kennedy Sr.
Ambassador Kennedy reported to Washington in 1938 that Neville Chamberlain
told him that the United States and Talmudists throughout the world forced Great
Britain into the Second World War. Chamberlain also told Ambassador Kennedy
in 1938 that Great Britain had nothing with which to fight Gemiany, that Great
Britain should not risk going to war against Germany. Chamberlain complained to
Ambassador Kennedy that United States Ambassador to France William C. Bullit
in 1938 was urging President Roosevelt that Germany must be ’’faced down” in
their attitude towards Poland in the Danzig Corridor matter. President Roosevelt
recalled Ambassador Kennedy to silence him. Ambassador Kennedy planned to
return to the United States to write a book telling what he knew that he thought
the grass roots population of the United States should be told. President Roosevelt
sent for Ambassador Kennedy upon his return to the United States to come to
Washington to see him. President Roosevelt told Ambassador Kennedy that he
had heard that he was planning to write a book which he asked him not to do.
After Ambassador Kennedy’s unpleasant meeting with President Roosevelt in
Washington after his recall from London for daring to circulate what Chamberlain
had told him about Talmudists, his ambition in life was to see one of his sons in
the White House as president of the United States. The story of how President
Lyndon Baines Johnson lied the United States into the desperate predicament in
which the United States today finds itself in the Middle East is not a long story. It
commences with a telephone call to this author in New York from Congressman
Ed Gosset in Washington to come there at once. Congressman Gosset represent¬
ed Amarillo, Texas, in the House of Representatives. Congressman Gosset was
alarmed that the Senate Armed Services Committee the day before confirmed the
appointment of Anna M. Rosenberg as Assistant Secretary of Defense without a
public hearing. The only witness who appeared to testify concerning Anna
Rosenberg's fitness to serve as Assistant Secretary of Defense was Anna
Rosenberg herself. That by itself aroused suspicion among the country’s leaders.
Congress Gosset took this author to Senator Johnson's office and explained to him
the reason for the visit. Senator Johnson was a member of the Senate Armed
Services Committee which had confirmed Anna Rosenberg's appointment the
previous day. Senator Johnson was very much interested in learning about Anna
Rosenberg's associations with communists. Senator Johnson asked this author if
he would assist him in looking into the matter further by producing a communist
who knew Anna Rosenberg. Upon this author's return to New York that day, he
mentioned Senator Johnson’s request to his attorney, Mr. Hallam Richardson.
Within a few hours, Mr. Richardson produced Mr. Ralph de Sola, a prominent
communist, the head of film photography of documents by communist organiza¬
tions in the United States. After Anna Rosenberg's confirmation by the Senate
Armed Services Committee was withdrawn, another hearing was held to confirm
her second appointment. Anna Rosenberg testified she was born in Hungary and
came to the United States in 1912 at the age of eleven years. The second hearing
brought out some interesting facts - it confirmed her extended appointment for
four years. In this author’s meetings with Sen. Johnson, this author had occasion
to discuss the Palestine question with him. Senator Johnson was very interested in
the Palestine question. That subject was of great interest to the Senate Armed
Services Committee. The occupation of Palestine by the Zionists concerned the
Armed Services Committee.
Lyndon B. Johnson and the so-called Six Day War
Senator Johnson was vice-president before the death of President Kennedy ele¬
vated him. He then became president of the United States. As president of the
United States, Johnson was aware of the possibility of armed conflict in the
Middle East in which the United States might become involved. President
Johnson understood the power Talmudists exerted in the United States and in the
United Nations. One of his closest friends in Washington was Mr. Abe Fortas, a
prominent Zionist, whom President Johnson appointed to the Supreme Court.
President Johnson knew he was violating the letter and spirit of his oath of office
as the president of all the people of the United States when he filled the pipe lines
of the State of Israel with munitions of war paid for with the money of Christian
taxpayers in the United States. President Johnson cannot plead ignorance of the
facts. Through a very close mutual friend, this author kept President Johnson con¬
stantly informed on developments in the Middle East. President Johnson will be
the first to admit he lied the United States into the desperate predicament in which
the United States today finds itself in the Middle East if he will glance at the
promises, pledges and predictions he made to Talmudists in the United States
while he occupied the White House as president of the United States. President
Johnson now seeks to justify his generosity with United States taxpayers’ money
by referring to a ’’commitment.” President Johnson knows that he is in error. The
only commitment the taxpayers in the United States recognize is President
Johnson’s commitment to serve the best interests of the grass roots population of
the United States. According to the Pentagon Papers he was not very successful
in that respect. President Johnson does not display mature judgment when he
squanders billions of the taxpayers’ hard-earned dollars to aid and abet crooks to
hold onto their stolen loot, their stolen plunder. President Johnson would feel dif¬
ferently if the Soviet Union financed an invasion of Texas by Mexicans who
expelled Texans from their homes with only shirts on their backs to survive in
refugee camps in the deserts of Arizona and New Mexico on six cents a day for
food provided by the United Nations. Mexicans have a more legitimate claim to
the territory called Texas today than the eastern European Talmudists ever had to
Palestine. What would President Johnson's attitude have been if the Soviet Union
contributed thirty-two billion dollars ($32,000,000,000) to go towards entrench¬
ing these Mexican invaders in Texas, and then supplying the Mexican invaders
with sophisticated military hardware to threaten the other forty-nine United States
if they interfered with the illegal possession of Texas by the Mexican invaders in
illegal occupation of Texas, without having paid one cent to the lawful landown¬
ers for a square foot of Texas. The story how President Nixon lied the United
States into the desperate predicament in which the United States today finds itself
is of great interest to the grass roots population of the United States every time
President Nixon grants the Zionists, in illegal occupation of Palestine, another
five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) of United States taxpayers’ money. Is
President Nixon serving two masters? President Nixon is as guilty as the other six
masters of deception who lied the United States into the desperate predicament in
which the United States today finds itself in the Middle East. President Nixon is
both an eminent lawyer and President of the United States. President Nixon can¬
not produce any evidence of a legitimate ’’commitment” to anyone to support
President Nixon’s generous use of United States taxpayers’ money for financing
the pemianent possession by thieves of their stolen loot. Does President Nixon
mean the ’’commitment” by political leaders to the Talmudists in the United States
who control the media for mass information? President Nixon belittles himself as
well as the United States Administration for whom he speaks when he talks about
a ’’commitment” of the United States to underwrite the perpetual possession of the
illegal and immoral theft of Palestine by Talmudists. President Nixon's generosi¬
ty has reached epidemic proportions. Each of the additional five hundred million
dollars ($500,000,000) of United States taxpayers’ money he donates to the so-
called State of Israel is that many more nails in the coffin of the United States.
These seven masters of deception mock the elementary and equitable principles
upon which the United States was founded when they throw hard-earned United
States taxpayers’ dollars by the billions to criminals in possession of their stolen
loot as if it were stage money. Have they no shame or conscience? When there
were civil wars recently in the Congo, in Nagana, in Pakistan and other countries
in this century, did the United States ’’recognize” the populations as independent
indigenous populations who planned to secede and form their sovereign inde¬
pendent states? Then why recognize transplanted alien invaders financed by
Talmudists? If these seven masters of deception reflected the honorable attitude
the United States should exhibit, they would not traffic with thieves, murderers,
and scoundrels as they are doing with the hooligans from the State of Israel. The
United States refused to ’’recognize” the independence of Katanga, of Biafra, of
East Pakistan, of Quebec and of total Ireland, but they rushed to ’’recognize” the
hooligans of an armed Palestine uprising by transplanted aliens as a legitimate
sovereign state. What next?
Controlling the US Vote in the United Nations
The one hundred and twenty-five other members of the United Nations know that
the United States was as crooked as a cork screw to recognize the so-called State
of Israel as a lawful representative government of the indigenous population. The
other nations of the world all know by this time that Talmudists elect the presi¬
dents of the United States and members of Congress. If these Talmudists in the
United States were paupers, they could not elect a dog catcher in the United
States. How rotten can the political system in the United States get before it drops
into the lap of a more honorable nation like a rotten piece of fmit falls from a tree?
Rothschilds and the Suez Canal
The so-called State of Israel is positive that the United States must at the request
of the State of Israel veto any resolution introduced in the Security Council to
expel the so-called State of Israel. Consequently, this so-called State of Israel feels
as smug as a bug in a rug regardless of what they do. The Talmudists control the
delegation in the United States. Nobody but a fool or an ignoramus doubts that
today. The Talmudists always instruct the delegates of the United States how to
vote in the Security Council. If a resolution is ever introduced to expel the so-
called State of Israel, the United States must veto the resolution. The grass roots
population of the United States deserves to know the tmth about the Middle East
crisis. They will pay with their lives unless they soon acquire a better under¬
standing about why the Middle East crisis exists. The United States finds it con¬
venient to blame everything that goes wrong anywhere in the world on
Communism. Communism provides a convenient whipping boy for politicians.
The arch villains behind the world's difficulties are the Rothschild’s. For the
moment, this author will only deal with the Rothschild's interest in the subject
matter of this article, the Middle East desperate predicament of the world. This
author can speak with confidence on this subject as his knowledge was obtained
first hand from members of the Rothschild dynasty in London, New York and
elsewhere. The extent of the Rothschild wealth cannot be estimated with any
degree of certainty. A conservative guess of the total value of the Rothschild for¬
tunes would be billions of dollars, if that amount can be imagined. The important
thing is the major portion of this wealth is in the Far East. The Rothschild inter¬
est in Europe, and the Western Hemisphere, are tremendous. However, in com¬
parison to their wealth in the Far East, it is significant. A most vital single thing
in the world to the Rothschild dynasty is access to the Far East. Access to the Far
East through the Mediterranean is know as Great Britain's lifeline. The Rothschild
dynasty had plunged Great Britain into many wars only to preserve their lifeline
to the Far East. History tells that story. The Suez Canal was not constmcted by the
Rothschild’s. They did their utmost to prevent its construction. The Suez Canal
was constructed by the Frenchman, de Lesseps, and the Khedive of Egypt. The
Rothschild’s refused to invest one cent of their money in the company which
obtained the concession to construct the Suez Canal. The Suez Canal was com¬
pleted in 1869. It, from the very start, proved a great success. The Rothschild's
swindled a forty percent (40%) interest in the Suez Canal Company from the
Khedive of Egypt. They found a forty percent (40%) interest insufficient for their
purpose as the value of the Suez Canal had been demonstrated after it was in use
two years. The Rothschild's decided they must control their lifeline to their for¬
tune in the Far East. Without justification or provocation of any description, the
Rothschild’s had Great Britain occupy Egypt exactly as a defeated power is occu¬
pied by the victor. The British ran the schools, the banks, the railroads, the courts,
and Egypt ceased to be Egypt except in name. Naturally, the Suez Canal came
under complete control of Great Britain. The original concession for the Suez
Canal was for ninety-nine years. The more important the Suez Canal became to
the Rothschild’s, the more the Rothschild's worried what was going to happen
when the ninety-nine year concession for the Suez Canal expired in 1969 and
reverted to Egypt as the concession provided. Great Britain spent large fortunes
and spilled much blood in many wars to maintain uninterrupted and undisturbed
possession of the Suez Canal. The Rothschild’s knew that Egypt would be free to
grant a new concession for the Suez Canal to a power unfriendly to Great Britain,
like France, Germany or Russia, when the concession expired. The Rothschild's
feared the consequences should the Suez Canal fall into the hands of an unfriend¬
ly power and Great Britain had many powers in mind who could make good use
of the Suez Canal politically also against the British Empire.
Zionist Supervision Necessary to Control Middle East Situation
The Rothschild dynasty's fortune and Great Britain’s authority would diminish in
the Far East if Great Britain no longer controlled the Suez Canal. Looking ahead.
the Rothschild's planned their future without the Suez Canal. The First World War
ended in 1918 and the Rothschild's had their plan ready. Their plan was very sim¬
ple. Under the October 1916 London Agreement, Great Britain planned to turn
over Palestine to the Zionists after the war. The eastern European Talmudists had
no money. Without money Palestine was a headache to the Zionists. The
Rothschild’s in London promised the Zionists unlimited financial assistance with
which to develop Palestine, but on one condition - that as soon as Palestine was
turned over to the Zionists, they apply for admission to the British Empire as a
member. The Rothschild's planned to construct a canal in Palestine from
Ashkelon on the Mediterranean to Aqaba on the Gulf of Aqaba. They planned to
construct a modern steel and concrete canal with two lanes for ships. The canal
would be on British territory in perpetuity enjoying the advantages of defense by
Great Britain if needed and international recognition as a member of the British
Empire. Great Britain occupied Palestine from 1921 to 1948 as the Mandatory of
the League of Nations. During that period the British Empire fell apart. By the
time the Zionists established a Zionist state in Palestine, the British Empire had
fallen apart and no longer existed. Palestine under the Zionists could not apply for
admission to the British Empire. There was no British Empire. When the
Rothschild’s realized what was happening, they were compelled to alter their
plans. The Rothschild's were determined that Great Britain must turn over
Palestine to the Zionists for a sovereign Zionist state. The idea of a United Nations
was then a reality and the Rothschild's planned upon getting the sovereign Zionist
state admitted to the United Nations. The United Nations would provide Palestine
with the same advantages that the British Empire would have provided once upon
a time. If the sovereign Zionist state could be admitted to the United Nations,
Palestine’s future was assured. Rothschild's did not know what to do. Then in
October 1916, the World Zionist Organization entered the picture. When Great
Britain was considering surrender to Germany, the World Zionist Organization
and the British War Cabinet entered into the October 1916 London Agreement.
The Rothschild dynasty was astonished when, on April 6, 1917, the United States
declared war against Germany. By July 1917 it appeared that Germany would be
defeated after the entry of the United States into the war. The Rothschild dynasty
sought out Mr. Chaim Weizmann and cultivated his friendship. The Rothschild's
realized that the World Zionist Organization must be recognized. The
Rothschild’s purchased a Prince Albert frock coat and a silk hat for Chaim
Weizmann and treated him as though he was already the head of the government
of Palestine, which he eventually became. The Rothschild’s renewed their inter¬
est in the plan to finance the Zionist movement in Palestine in exchange for the
concession to construct their modem canal across Palestine in competition with
the Suez Canal. Great Britain was certain to defeat Germany. Great Britain had
agreed to turn over Palestine to the Talmudists of the world for railroading the
United States into the war in Europe as Great Britain’s ally. The only link miss¬
ing now was the existence in Palestine of an independent sovereign Zionist state.
The Rothschild's financed transplanting 600,000 eastern European Talmudists
into Palestine and arranged to remove the last of General Allenby’s 200,000
British troops from Palestine.
Rothschild Interests and ’’Chosen” Asiatic Jews
In collaboration with President Truman in the United States the armed 600,000
transplanted alien Talmudists on May 18, 1948, began their expulsion from
Palestine of the Christian and Moslem disarmed and defenseless 1.350,000 popu¬
lation and at the same time declared their armed uprising the State of Israel. The
Rothschild’s were now satisfied. The only unfinished business was to force the
Middle East nations to recognize the State of Israel. The Rothschild's commenced
their final stage by building the present oil pipeline from Ashkelon on the
Mediterranean to Aqaba, along the route of their future modern long-planned steel
and concrete two-lane canal. The Middle East situation is the result of the
Rothschild efforts to secure permanent and secure access to the Far East. This
nonsense about the "repatriation” of "Gods chosen people” to "their promised
land” has been revealed the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind. The sin¬
gle purpose of the Rothschild's was to secure permanent and secure access to their
vast natural resources in the Far East. This author has had the patience and the
time to inform seven presidents of the United States about the underlying reason
for the Middle East aggression by the Talmudist throughout the world. These
seven masters of deception were all briefed by this author on the reason for the
aggression in Palestine. This author spent a small fortune acquainting members of
Congress and political and industrial leaders in the United States with all these
facts, supplying them with photostat reproductions of documentary evidence to
support every statement made by this author. It cries out to heaven that this coun¬
try and the world has been put to the expense of billions of billions of dollars to
see the Rothschild’s have secure and permanent access to their unlimited wealth
in the Far East. If the Talmudists of the world say they are willing to see another
world war fought to establish "God's chosen people” in "their promised land” to
rule the world from Palestine, then it is time to tell the grass roots of the United
States population what all the excitement is about. This issue must be dragged into
the light for the grass roots of the population of the United States to see why they
are expected to die in an unnecessary war with a smile on their face.
Other material by Freedman
Facts Are Facts: The Truth About Khazars (80 pp; 1955)
’’Christians Duped by Unholiest Floax in All Flistory! 'Big Lie’ Technique Pushing U.S.A.
to the Brink of World War III” (article in Common Sense, May 1, 1959, p. 4; mentions the
’’Six Million Jew Hoax”)
"’Ben Freedman Speaks: The Jews and World War III” (also transcripts with other titles) -
speech given before audience in 1961 at the Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of
Conde McGinley’s newspaper Common Sense (recorded time: 92 min. - available from
Liberty Bell)
Statement, October, 1966 (?; Ben found the six million figure so exaggerated that he sug¬
gested a deliberate swindle)
The Wall Street Jews (audio/book?; available from Christian Defence League)
Zionist Control of America (available from Omni Christian Book Club)
Related books
”My Exploited Father-in-law” by Curtis B. Dali (Christian Crusade Publications, Tulsa,
OK)
’’When the Cheering Stopped” by Gene Smith (Morrow & Co., New York)
’’The Makers of War” by Francis Neilson (Great Britain; 240 pp)
’’Pearl Harbor: The Story of the Secret War” by George Morgenstern (435 pp)
’’Pearl Harbor Reexamined: Prologue to the Pacific War”
by Hilary Conroy and Harry Wray (200 pp)
’’Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace: A Critical Examination of the Foreign Policy of
Franklin Delano Roosevelt and its Aftermath” by Harry Elmer Barnes (740 pp)
"’Back Door to War” by Professor Charles Callan Tansill (1952; 652 pp)
’’Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years” by Israel Shahak
(1994)
’’The Controversy of Zion” by Douglas Reed (1978; 580 pp)
Timetable
1875 - Lionel de Rothschild buys most of the stocks in the Suez Canal
Nov. 24, 1887 - ”His first great success was the acquisition of Suez Canal shares.”
(Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1999 edition, ’’Disraeli, Benjamin”); Disraeli (D’lsraeli),
Christian-Jewish Prime Minister of Great Britain and ’’the real creator of the British Empire
in the former century” (N. Goldmann, ’’The Jewish Paradox”); father Isaac stated that
Judaism ’’cuts off the Jews from the great family of mankind” (Encyclopaedia Britannica);
Benjamin recited the six words of the ’’Hebrew Shema” (confessing Jewish faith) at his
deathbed 1881 (Rothschild biographer), thus admitting being one of those ’’secret Jews”
(Disraeli, ’’Tancred,” 1847); ”we cannot be destroyed. It... baffled Egyptian and Assyrian
kings, Roman emperors, and Christian inquisitors.” (Disraeli, ’’Coningsby,” 1844)
1914 - Beginning of war; Great Britain, France and Russia Vs
Germany, Austria-Hungary and Turkey
(Oct. 1916 - Secret agreement)
April 6, 1917 - America (pro-German) declares war
against Germany on (as Britain’s ally)
Nov. 2, 1917 - Balfour Declaration; written to Lord (Lionel Walter) Rothschild by secret
Jew Leopold Maurice (Moritz) Amery-Saphir
(Nov. 7, 1917 - Bolshevik takeover of Russia
supported and funded by Germany and Jews)
Dec. 9, 1917 - British capture of Jerusalem
End of war 1918
1939-1945 - WWII; Nazi-Zionist ’’Haavara” (Transfer) Agreement (1933); Communist-
Nazi split of Polish Jewry (1939)
May 14, 1948 - State of Israel
1948-1953 - ’’the black years” in Russia (Jewish Encyclopedia); ’’anti-Semitic” Stalin;
Stalin dies (1953)
1956 - Israel launches the ’’Suez War”
Quotes
”1 have the solution to the Jewish Question. I know it sounds mad; and at the beginning I
shall be called mad more than once - until the truth of what I am saying is recognised in all
its shattering force.”
(Theodor Herzl, in his diaiy)
”If I were to sum up the Basel congress in a single phrase, I would say, "In Basel I created
the Jewish State.’ Was I to say this aloud, I would be greeted by universal laughter, but per¬
haps five years hence, in any case, certainly in fifty years, everyone will agree.”
(Theodor Herzl, in his diary)
’’Herzl... worked to achieve an object which he had set as goal... Herzl [did] foresee twen¬
ty years, before we experienced them... that the [world] events would offer the Jewish peo¬
ple fresh opportunities”
(Marcus Ehrenpreis, international rabbi from Sweden)
”... let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder lead¬
ing upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist (1897) Congress, the English Uganda proposi¬
tion [1903], the future World War [WW1, 1914-1918], [the Balfour Declaration 1917,] the
peace conference [1919-1920] where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine
[Israel, three years after WW2] will be created.”
(Max Nordau-Suedfeld, Herzl’s right-hand, speaking at the Zionist Congress at Basle in
August 1903; ’’American Jewish News, ” New York, Vol. 4, No. 2, September 19, 1919)
’’The Paris Peace conference that gathered in early 1919 oversaw the redrawing of the map
of most of Europe and large parts of the rest of the world. [...] The new German state lost...
large stretches of Prussian lands to Poland, establishing an awkward intrusion, the ‘Polish
Corridor’ to the sea, for the new and otherwise land-locked state of Poland. [...] The
Germans were hardly the only people to feel cheated by the peace treaties, or to blame Jews
for them. [...] The weakness of Hungary in defeat made possible the temporary victory of
a communist takeover... From being a country whose elites recognized the usefulness of
Jews, it became one in which Jews were widely seen as destroyers. [...] Most of the new
countries to emerge from the collapse of the Russian and Austro-Hungarian empires [after
WW1] had sizable Jewish populations, and the new leaders of these countries were
required by the Allies to accept so-called minority clauses... Many of the leaders of the new
nations saw the minority clauses as providing a way for the Jews to be able to continue in
their prewar economic prevalence - or even to exercise a behind-the-scenes domination of
the new countries... American and British Jews at the Peace Conference [after WW1]
played a key role in the formulation of the terms of the minority clauses. [...] The Peace
Conference dealt with many issues, including carving up the defunct Turkish Empire,
which had profound implications for the Jewish Question in Europe, in that it opened up a
possible fulfillment of the Zionist dream, establishment of a national home for Jews in
Palestine. [...] In early 1917 [during the end of WW1] it was as if events conspired to favor
the Zionist cause: The armies of the British Empire began the conquest of Palestine”
(Alberts. Lindemann; ’’Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism
and the rise of the Jews, " pp. 409-416, 1997)
”At its [WW1] start [1914] Baron Edmond de Rothschild told Dr. [Chaim] Weizmann that
it would spread to the Middle East, where things of great significance to Political Zionism
would occur.”
(Douglas Reed, former Times correspondent; "Far and Wide, ” p. 285)
”1 think that a Jewish Palestine must become a war aim for America”
(Dr. Chaim Weizmann, in a letter to Justice Louis
D. Brandeis, Supreme Court, dated Jan. 14, 1918)
”In 1919 Dr. Weizmann said, ‘We do not aspire to found a Zionist State... We cannot hope
to rule in a country in which only one-seventh of the population at present are Jews.’”
(Douglas Reed, former Times correspondent; "Far and Wide, ” p. 318)
’’When they met again, Balfour first told Weizmann, ‘You may get your things done much
more quickly after the war.’ [...] At the same time, the London government was keen to
interpose something between the French who were planning to take over Syria, and the
Suez canal. In this respect, the idea of a Jewish Palestine was tempting.”
(’’Controversy of Zion” by Geoffrey Wheatcroft, 1996)
”[A] Jewish Palestine would be a safeguard to Palestine, in particular in respect to the Suez
Canal”
(An assurance made to the Zionist and British Assistant Foreign Secretary Lord Robert
Cecil; he was one of the founders of the League of Nations, the UN)
’’[Lord Cecil] saw it in its true perspective as an integral part of world stabilization. To him
the re-establishment of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and the organization of the world
in a great federation were complementary features of the next step in the management of
human affairs.”
(Chaim Weizmann, first Prime Minister of Israel, about British Assistant Foreign
Secretary Lord Robert Cecil; Weizmann's ’’Trial and Error”)
’’[Lloyd George, British Prime Minister] was very anxious that a determined offensive
should be made in Palestine... He was strongly under the impression that Palestine should
be made a decisive feature of the war”
(Mr. Jan Smuts, British General in WW1; called in from South Africa to fight in Palestine
when manpower and weapons were needed elsewhere)
’’One of the great objects we fought for in the war
was to provide a national home for the Jewish people”
(Mr. Jan Smuts, British General in WWI; called in from South Africa to fight in Palestine
when manpower and weapons were needed elsewhere)
’’There never was such nonsense as this idea the Jews have that they are an exclusive, pure
race. They are the most impure race on earth. I doubt if they are even Semites.”
(Mr. Jan Smuts, British General in WWI; called in from South Africa to fight in Palestine
when manpower and weapons were needed elsewhere)
’’England has fallen totally into the hands of the Jews and the Americans. [...] This war
[WW1...] is in the deepest sense the war of Jewry [‘Judentum’] and its near relative,
Americanism, for the control of the world.”
(H.S. Chamberlain, an Englishman living in Germany,
in a letter to German Kaiser Wilhelm II)
’’[Russia 1917 shows] insanity in power [... The Russian people have been] turned over to
the vengeance of the Jews, who are connected with all the Jews of the world.”
(Wilhelm II, German Kaiser, abdicated in 1918 after the Marxist-Jewish revolution in
Germany led to the crumbling of her war effort and the loss of World War I)
’’Where we sink we become revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revo¬
lutionary party: when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.”
(Theodor Herzl, ”Der Judenstaat,” p. 91, 1946 edition)
’’Two million Jews have already been exterminated... The democracies have a clear duty
before them... Let them negotiate with Germany through neutral countries concerning the
possible release of the Jews in the occupied countries... Let the gates of Palestine be opened
to all who can reach the shores of the Jewish homeland”
(Chaim Weizmann, at a mass demonstration in Madison Square Garden;
reported by the N.Y. Times the day after, March 2, 1943)
’’These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race
who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. [...] So the Khazars became what we call
today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to
say, ‘We’re going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God’s Chosen People to their
ancestral homeland, their Promised Land.’ Could there be a bigger lie than that?”
(Benjamin H. Freedman, 71 year old Zionist defector, in 1961)
’’The President [Roosevelt] called a cabinet meeting this morning and told us that he want¬
ed us to be at war with Japan, but that he did not want it to appear to the public that the
United States had fired the first shot.”
(Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of Defense during World War 11;
from his daily for Nov. 21, 1941, two weeks prior to Pearl Harbor)
”1 say again and again and again that I will never send American boys to fight on foreign
soil.”
(Slogan of Franklin D. Roosevelt election campaign)
’’[Anti-Semitism will] act as a propelling force which, like the wave of the future, would
bring the Jews into the promised land.”
(Theodor Herzl)
’’Palestine was not invaded by six million dead Jews, or, indeed, by any dead Jews”
(Arthur R. Butz; ’’The Hoax of the Twentieth Century,” 1976)
’’[The Russian Tsar’s laws are] so hard and mean that they could make many Jews become
violent nihilists.”
(Lionel Walter Rothschild, 1868-1937, in a letter to Gerson von Bleichroder, 1890)
’’The people of God co-operate with atheists; the most skillful accumulators of property
ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the
scum and low castes of Europe; and all this because they wish to destroy... Christendom
which owes to them even its name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure.”
(Benjamin Disraeli, a Jewish Prime Minister of Great Britain;
’’The Life of Lord George Bcntinck,” 1852)
’’Without me Zionism wouldn’t have flourished, and without Zionism I wouldn’t have done
anything.”
(Edmond de Rothschild; Rothschild biographer, Frederick Morton)
”As for the anti-Semitic feelings, the Jews themselves are to blame, and the present agita¬
tion must be ascribed to their arrogance, vanity and unspeakable insolence.”
(Meyer Carl Rothschild (1820-1886), in a letter to Gerson von Bleichroder)
’’The World War [1914-1918] will see the establishment of Communism in Russia [1917];
a second world war will extend its control over Europe [true in 1945]; and a third world
war will be necessary to make it worldwide”
(Vladimir Lenin; ’’Collected Works”; died in 1924)
’’[Lenin] gathered together the leading spirits of a formidable sect, the most formidable sect
in the world... With these spirits around him he set to work with demoniacal ability to tear
to pieces every institution on which the Russian state and nation depended.”
(Winston Churchill, in the House of Commons, Nov. 5th 1919)
’’Should the... Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, [its...] Crown will be
the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through
ether, without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago.”
(Adolf Hitler; "My Struggle, ” Vol. I, P- 46, 1925)
”It is Semitism gone wild for vengeance and, if it is ultimately carried out (I can’t believe
that it will be) it as sure as fate will lay the seeds for another war in the next generation.”
(Henry L. Stimson, September, 1944)
’’[Roosevelt] met... ally... King Faud of Saudi Arabia in 1944... promised... not to support
a Jewish state in Palestine.”
(Elliott Roosevelt, son of President Franklin,
in his book ”A.s' He Saw It”)
”My friends are Jews, the Jews wants the dividing [of Palestine], Then they shall have it.”
(Harry S. Truman; quoted in "The Jewish paradox, ” Nahum Goldmann, 1978)
”It was our great fortune, that Roosevelt was replaced by Harry Truman...”
(Nahum Goldmann, leader World Zionist Organization and
World Jewish Congress; ’’The Jewish paradox, ” 1978)
"Since it ['Judenstaat'] now is a state [Israel] it would be immoral to let it be destroyed,
but if one asked me before it existed, then I would have said, that it isn't the solution to the
Jewish problem.”
(Henry A. Kissinger, a.k.a. Avraham Bel Elazar,
Jewish-German-American Foreign Minister)
”1 have been in the position, as a Jew, of conducting the foreign policy of a superpower.”
(Henry Kissinger, former US national security advisor and secretary of state, when
receiving the Elie Wiesel Holocaust Remembrance Award; Kissinger was later even in
charge of Israel-Arab affairs - after Truman’s resignation)
”We insisted on Palestine not because of religious, historical or sentimental reasons, but
because Palestine is a turning table of three continents and in the military, political, and
strategic sense it is the world’s center. [...] Besides the oil reserves in this area are much
higher than on the whole American continent.”
(Dr. Nahum Goldmann-Leibmann, then not yet a Zionist leader, at the 7th meeting
of the Canadian Jewish Congress in Spring of 1947; Golda Meir, "My Life”)
"’The Jews might have had Uganda, Madagascar, and other places for the establishment of
a Jewish Fatherland, but they wanted absolutely nothing except Palestine, not because the
Dead Sea water by evaporation can produce five trillion dollars of metalloids and pow¬
dered metals; not because the sub-soil of Palestine contains twenty times more petroleum
than all the combined reserves of the two Americas; but because Palestine is the crossroads
of Europe, Asia, and Africa, because Palestine constitutes the veritable center of world
political power, the strategic center for world control.”
(Nahum Goldmann; ”The Jewish Paradox,” 1976)
”18 percent of the Jewish people live in Israel and more than 80 percent in other countries.
[...] If the Diaspora Jews decided tomorrow that Israel didn't interesting to them anymore,
the shop would close and Israel would cease to exist economical as well as political. Would
America support Israel if American Jewry didn't care for the country any more?”
(Nahum Goldmann; ’’The Jewish Paradox, ” 1976, p. 91)
”1 admit that Palestine according the international laws belongs to you [Arabs-
Palestinians], But we have suffered so much during two thousand years... Imagine this for
a moment, what would happen if all of people of the earth should require to regain the ter¬
ritories they lost two thousand years ago. Do you see the chaos, this would result in? But
here is a people, who have the boldness to require this and the world has granted this. But
when I say the world it is not the matter of the masses or even the diplomats: only the great
statesmen. [...] Without Balfour, without Lloyd George, without Wilson we would never
have seen the Balfour Declaration of 1917 or what later occurred.”
(Nahum Goldmann; "The Jewish Paradox, ” 1976, pp. 98, 99 & 101)
’’The Jews are, as I mentioned, a very complicated and exceptional people. It isn’t easy to
have a clear and plain picture of them. [...] the Arabs have the same memory as the Jews.
The Semitic race is very stubborn and never forgets... one could say [‘the Hebrew people’
but...] ‘the Jewish people’ is more suitable... Instead of the idea of a ‘chosen people' I pre¬
fer the one about ‘a unique people’”
(Nahum Goldmann; ”The Jewish Paradox,” 1976)
’’While it is a country God has promised us, it doesn’t interest them [the Palestinians], Our
God is not their God. We have our origin in Israel, that’s true... There have been anti-
Semitism, Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz. But was it their [the Palestinians] fault? The only see
one fact: We have come and we have stole their land. Why should they accept it? They will
maybe forget about it in one or two generations, but for now there is no chance. It is thus
simple: we must remain strong, have a powerful army. There you have our politics.
Otherwise the Arabs will destroy us.”
(David Ben Gurion; Nahum Goldmann,
’’The Jewish Paradox, ” 1976, pp. 98, 99 & 101)
’’The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination... Western and Eastern
Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic
regime. With the exception of the USSR as a federated Eurasian state, all other continents
will become united in an international police force. All armies will be abolished, and here
will be no more wars. In Jerusalem the United States (a truly United States) will build a
Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of
the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents,
as prophesied by Isaiah.”
(David Ben-Gurion, a.k.a. Grim, the first Prime Minister of Israel;
Look magazine, January 16, 1962, p. 20)
’’During the almost two thousand years of Diaspora... there isn’t any person who could
compete with the extraordinary personality of Baron Edmond de Rothschild.”
(David Ben Gurion, first Prime Minister of Israel)
”1 ain’t a Philanthropist. [...] I took the initiative to find out if it’s possible to place Jews on
Palestinian soil.”
(Edmond de Rothschild, to one of the founders ofRishon Le Zion,
First of Zion; quoted by Rothschild biographer)
”1 have tried to prove that the Children of Israel is capable of becoming good colonist and
farmers, but the only thing you have succeeded in proving is doing rebellion and commit¬
ting dissension”
(Edmond in Palestine, to Jewish colonists; quoted by Rothschild biographer)
’’[The Rothschilds are...] the most efficient force our people has own since the Diaspora.”
(Theodor Herzl; quoted by Rothschild biographer)
”My dear Prime Minister,
My father began his colonization work in Israel 75 years ago [1882], The work which was
then begun has been continued to this day. [My father Edmond...] set up the Palestine
Jewish Colonization Association... We intend to provide the sum of IL6 million for the
construction of the new Knesseth building in Jerusalem... Let the new Knesseth building
become a symbol, in the eyes of all men, of the permanence of the State of Israel. [...] With
this done, P.I.C.A. will withdraw from the scene of Israel in the knowledge that the work
which was begun 75 years ago is being carried on by the State and the people, supported
by world Jewry. [...] I do not intend, with this letter, to take leave of you or of Israel. My
interest in the development of Israel is abiding, even if P.I.C.A. must cease to operate, I
shall remain as close to you all as I have always been, your cares will be my cares and your
happiness will be my happiness. [...] The foundations of the State have been well and truly
laid. I am confident that, by the grace of the Almighty, the new chapter in the history of our
people, which began with the creation of the State, will be glorious and enduring.
Yours Sincerely,
James de Rothschild”
(James de Rothschild, 1878-1957; letter sent
to Prime Minister David Ben Gurion in 1957)
”In 1956 I eagerly swallowed all of Ben-Gurion’s political and military reasons for Israel
initiating the Suez War, until he (in spite of being an atheist, proud of his disregard of the
commandments of Jewish religion) pronounced in the Knesset on the third day of that war,
that the real reason for it is ‘the restoration of the kingdom of David and Solomon’ to its
Biblical borders.”
(Israel Shakah; ’’Jewish History, Jewish Religion,” 1994)
’’David Ben-Gurion, Israeli Prime Minister, in a speech to the Knesset on the third day of
the Suez War in 1956 stated that the real reason for the war was the restoration of the
Kingdom of David and Solomon to its Biblical borders. At this point in his speech virtual¬
ly every Knesset member spontaneously rose and sang the Israeli national anthem.”
(David Paul; ’’Apartheid: Israeli Style," 1995)
”Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? (Galatians 4:16)”
(From the cover of "Facts are Facts” by Benjamin H. Freedman)
’’You have fought two world wars to discover what
we [Arabs] have known for two thousand years.”
(Ibn Saud, Egyptian king, to US president Roosevelt in 1945)
”[T]hey are our lords, yes, our mad tyrants... Meanwhile they wail that they are our cap¬
tives”
(Martin Luther, 1543)
Live Music
Archive
Librivox
Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland
Museum of Art
Internet
Arcade
Console Living Room
Open Library
American
Libraries
TV News
Understanding
9/11